During an interview with a Dutch sperm donor accused of fathering over 500 children and defrauding families, the Loose Women panel faced criticism for asking absurd questions. They were mocked: “If he’s just a sperm donor, why should he care for the children?”

Loose Women viewers were left outraged as Kaye Adams, Linda Robson, Katie Piper and Jane Moore chatted to The Man With 1,000 kids donor Jonathan Meijer.

Loose Women fans have slammed the ITV daytime show following an interview with Jonathan Meijer, the sperm donor at the centre of a shocking new Netflix docuseries, The Man with 1000 kids.

Kaye Adams, Katie Piper, Linda Robson and Jane Moore were back on the panel on Friday (July 26) lunchtime to discuss the latest headlines across the globe.

They brought Jonathan onto the show via video link to discuss his story as a Dutch sperm donor accused of fathering over 500 children and defrauding vulnerable families worldwide.

Netflix dropped the three-part series earlier this month and Jonathan has since said he has in fact helped bring 550 children into the world, not 1000.

During the awkward chat, the ladies appeared to become frustrated as Jonathan conintued to speak over them as they quizzed him about the controversial docuseries.

As they tuned into the latest edition of Loose Women, fans watching at home took to social media to share their thoughts and they didn’t hold back. Taking to X, formely known as Twitter, one fan penned: “Nah Loose Women, this is the worst interview I’ve ever seen. All four women don’t know how to interview. How can you ask a sperm doner why he doesn’t take care of his kids #loosewomen”

Another added: “Am I missing something? Surely he only donated to women who had requested donation? #loosewomen.” A third person wrote: “The @loosewomen interview with the Dutch sperm donor was terrible. They almost condemned this man for helping 550 women have children. And said he’s a ‘dad without the responsibilities’? What a joke. If nobody wanted to be a donor. Men would be the bad guys. #loosewomen

Jonathan previously revealed on the show he stopped donating sperm to new recipients, of his own volition, in 2019. He came to the decision, in part, because he wants to focus on having children of his own.

Four years later, a Dutch court ordered him to stop donating sperm, destroy any held by clinics and imposed a €100,000 fine for any future infraction, although it makes allowance for mothers who want biological siblings for their donor kids.

Meijer says he declined to participate in The Man with 1000 Kids because it’s not in the best interest of the donor children. “I think it’s really capitalising on these families, who were infertile or just wanted to have families,” he says.

“They’re good people, lovely people, and now people will ask them: ‘Oh, is your child one from the 1,000 donor doc?’ Is the doc going to do any good for the children?’.”

Loose Women viewers were met with a controversial interview as Kaye Adams, Linda Robson, Katie Piper, and Jane Moore spoke with Jonathan Meijer, known as The Man with 1,000 kids donor. The discussion revolved around the Netflix docuseries that shed light on Meijer’s story as a sperm donor accused of fathering over 500 children. Despite the panel’s attempts to delve into the complexities of his situation, Meijer’s demeanor and responses left many feeling frustrated.While some viewers expressed outrage at the interview, questioning the panel’s interviewing skills and the ethical implications of Meijer’s actions, others defended his choices. The debate around sperm donation, parental responsibilities, and the impact of the documentary on the donor children was heated and divisive.Meijer’s decision to halt his sperm donations in 2019, citing a desire to focus on his own family plans, raised further questions about the motivations behind his actions. The Dutch court’s ruling to restrict his sperm donations and the hefty fine imposed on him added a legal dimension to the conversation.As the discussion unfolded on Loose Women, social media buzzed with commentary on the interview. Some criticized the panel for their handling of the sensitive topic, while others praised the show for addressing a controversial issue. The nuances of sperm donation, family dynamics, and the rights of donor-conceived children were all brought into focus during the conversation.Looking ahead, it remains to be seen how the fallout from Meijer’s interview and the Netflix docuseries will impact the wider conversation around assisted reproduction and donor rights. As the debate continues to evolve, it is crucial to consider the perspectives of all parties involved and prioritize the well-being of the donor-conceived children.Stay tuned for more updates and insights on this evolving story, and join us in exploring the complexities of reproductive ethics in the modern world. Your feedback and engagement drive our commitment to delivering valuable and informative content.

 Follow us to see more useful information, as well as to give us more motivation to update more useful information for you.

Source: USA Today

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *