ITV watchers angrily stopped watching the show after Prince Harry’s interview, commenting, ‘I’m so annoyed with the same redundant answers in every interview, irrespective of the questions.’

Prince Harry complained that it “sucked” to have been under “constant surveillance” as his latest interview screened on ITV’s Tabloids on Trial this evening.

Prince Harry received a settlement of £140,000 after a High Court Judge ruled that “unlawful methods” had been used to collect evidence on him for tabloid stories.

It was ruled that 15 out of 30 stories about him by Mirror Newspaper Group (MGN) were a result of “invasions into his privacy”. 

However, viewers found themselves switching off when tonight’s Tabloids on Trial documentary saw Harry complain about being under “constant surveillance” in his younger years. 

He told ITV reporter Rebecca Barry: “It sucks being that young and being under constant surveillance.”

Harry and his wife Meghan Markle are now residents in the USA having stepped down from their senior royal duties in 2020. However, it seemed that, post-trial, some viewers were growing tired of Harry’s story, as some viewers admittedly refused to tune in to his latest TV interview.

“I couldn’t stand it! Complete switch off,” one groaned on Twitter. “No one should watch it,” echoed a second.

As Harry went on to say that his war with the press was a “central piece” in his rift with other members of the royal family, a third also hit the off button, declaring: “Wouldn’t dream of watching #itv.”

Another tweeted: ” Didn’t watch the last one and won’t be watching this one and others to come.” A fifth added: “I’m not watching it.”

However, he did receive some sympathy from royal fans following his concerns with the media.

One wrote: “As Prince Harry said, it’s a David and Goliath feat, fighting these media moguls; only a – strong – few can see it through. Prince Harry is a Hero!”

Another added: “Massive kudos to Harry for this!”

The Prince continued on the show that one headline, claiming that his then-girlfriend Chelsy Davy was planning to “dump him”, was “not in the public interest in any way whatsoever”.

He also addressed moments when his late mother Princess Diana had become the victim of possible hacking scandals.

“The tabloid press painted her as being paranoid – but she wasn’t paranoid. She was absolutely right about what was happening to her,” he insisted.

Harry has suggested that she was probably one of the first people ever to be hacked back in the mid-1990s.

In a recent interview on ITV’s Tabloids on Trial, Prince Harry opened up about the challenges he faced growing up under constant surveillance by the media. Despite receiving a settlement for unlawful methods used to gather stories about him, Harry expressed frustration at being under constant scrutiny at a young age. The Prince, along with his wife Meghan Markle, now resides in the USA after stepping down from their senior royal duties in 2020.Following the broadcast of the interview, some viewers expressed their disinterest in Harry’s ongoing battle with the press. Many took to social media to voice their opinions, with some even choosing to completely switch off from the interview. Despite this, there were also viewers who sympathized with Harry and praised him for taking a stand against media intrusion.During the interview, Harry highlighted the harmful impact of tabloid stories on both himself and his late mother, Princess Diana. He emphasized that stories like the one claiming his then-girlfriend was planning to dump him were not in the public interest. Harry also addressed the hacking scandals that Princess Diana faced, insisting that she was not paranoid but rather aware of the invasion of her privacy.As we continue to share valuable information and updates, we encourage you to stay connected with us for more insightful content. Your support motivates us to provide you with useful and trustworthy information. Thank you for being a part of our community.Sources: The Wall Street Journal

Follow us to see more useful information, as well as to give us more motivation to update more useful information for you. Source: The Wall Street Journal

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *