In a recent interview, King Charles shared a poignant reply when questioned about Prince Harry’s potential return to the United Kingdom. Since Prince Harry and Meghan Markle announced their decision to step back from royal duties in 2020, the couple has been residing in the United States with their two children. Their relationship with the royal family has undergone significant changes, leading to various reports surfacing over time.
According to a report from Mir UK, it has now come to light that Prince Harry and his father, King Charles, are experiencing a strained relationship and have had minimal contact. However, despite these circumstances, King Charles provided an unexpected response when confronted with the question of Prince Harry returning to England.
During a visit to the Stratford University campus in East London to commemorate its 125th anniversary, King Charles engaged with students and supporters. Amongst the crowd, one man shouted, “Please bring Harry. Could you please take him back, sir?” Initially, the king did not hear the remark and inquired about its content. The man then clarified, stating, “Harry, your son.”
Reacting nervously, King Charles responded, “That’s wonderful.” Meanwhile, Prince Harry attended his father’s coronation as King Charles at Westminster Abbey in June. Alongside his cousins, aunts, and uncles, he stood before the audience as a senior member of the royal family.
In his book “King Charles III: The Latest Addition to the Royal Biography Shelf,” author Robert Jobson delves into the dynamics within the British royal family. Jobson claims that as relations among the senior royals began to deteriorate, the late Queen and King Charles ceased returning Prince Harry’s correspondence. According to the book, King Charles took this action after Prince Harry directed a curse at him during a heated argument over financial matters. Subsequently, King Charles decided to stop responding to Harry’s calls, as his son persistently asked for money. When the queen inquired about Charles’s decision, he reportedly responded by stating he was not a banker.
The evolving relationship between Prince Harry and King Charles continues to be a subject of interest and speculation among royal enthusiasts.
As the relationship between Prince Harry and King Charles continues to be a topic of interest and speculation, the dynamics within the British royal family are constantly evolving. Despite reports of strained relations and minimal contact between the father and son duo, the possibility of Prince Harry returning to the United Kingdom remains uncertain.During a recent event at the Stratford University campus in East London, King Charles was unexpectedly confronted with a request for Prince Harry to be brought back to England. A supporter in the crowd shouted out, urging the king to “Please bring Harry. Could you please take him back, sir?” In response, King Charles appeared taken aback but simply stated, “That’s wonderful,” showing a moment of genuine sentiment.Author Robert Jobson’s book, “King Charles III: The Latest Addition to the Royal Biography Shelf,” sheds light on the complex relationships within the royal family. Jobson delves into the details of how the late Queen and King Charles stopped responding to Prince Harry’s correspondence after a heated argument over financial matters, where Harry allegedly directed a curse at his father. This led to King Charles making the decision to cut off communication with his son, who was repeatedly seeking financial support.The ongoing saga between Prince Harry and King Charles serves as a reminder of the challenges and complexities that exist within the royal family. While public interest in their relationship remains high, only time will tell if Prince Harry will indeed make a return to his home country. Stay tuned for more updates on the latest developments in the royal family, as we continue to bring you insightful and trustworthy information.
Follow us to see more useful information, as well as to give us more motivation to update more useful information for you.
Source: The Wall Street Journal
